Have you ever gone up to a house and knocked on the door, only to be greeted by the incessant yipping of little dogs? They don’t have any idea who is there, but they bark in their high pitched yip as though they could scare away Goliath himself. Even if the dog’s master yells out, “Shut up!” they just keep yipping. After knowing it’s you, they just keep on yipping. It’s almost as if they have to be loud and annoying because they feel inferior due to their size; there’s nothing to them, so they have to yip and yip so people will know they’re there. Most larger dogs don’t feel so inferior as to continue barking after their master tells them to quiet down, but more on that later, perhaps…
We’re all prone to occasionally making this mistake—feeling and looking foolish afterward. It’s dangerous for anyone to do it, but more so for those with power. There are some politicians, and others in prominent positions, that like to “yip” before they know what’s going on. Sometimes it may be from sour grapes, not getting what they had hoped for; other times, it’s revenge or trying to push an alternative agenda. Regardless the motivation, they too often speak without having gathered the facts. It would certainly behoove them to recognize the wisdom of Proverbs 18:13; “He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.”
Governor Chris Christie admitted that he hadn’t seen Mr. Khan’s speech at the DNC but still felt compelled to speak out against his party’s presidential candidate, Donald Trump, when Trump responded to Khan’s political attack. Admitting ignorance, he said that to focus on anything other than the honor due, for the sacrifice of their son, was “missing the point.”—“Yip, yip, yip.”
Never mind that this Muslim man took the patriotic sacrifice of his son and, without shame, yet shamefully politicized it. While having great respect for their grief and loss, we mustn’t fall into the trap of not responding to the false notions, propositions, and dangers which were either laid out plainly or alluded to within Mr. Khan’s speech. We should appreciate the sacrifice; but we must never ignore the poison we’re asked to swallow with it. Ignorance is not bliss. Some of our republican representatives would have done well to search out the matter before they responded, “Yip, yip, yip.”
Even after searching a matter out, one may still find himself mistaken as new information unfolds, but it might help to keep that person, or his party, from looking inept and agenda ridden. Instead, they look like little “yipping” dogs who feel inferior to the big dog. Even if one doesn’t care much for their party’s candidate, they’d be better off ignoring his statements or speaking to his strengths instead of siding with the opposition. Then again, who says that little “yippers” make good sense? “Yip, yip, yip,” but when the facts come out, they should have been saying, “Nope, nope, nope!”
A Constitution touting man, described as a “good Muslim,” is an enigma, indeed, and requires one to do his research before buying anything Khan hopes to sell from a DNC medicine wagon.
Let’s start with his deceptively disingenuous Constitution touting. While Khizr Khan is a Gold Star parent, he is NOT an adherent to the Constitution of the United States of America. It was disingenuous when Mr. Khan held up the Constitution in his hand while embracing Shariah in his heart. Any “good Muslim” who adheres to Shariah law cannot adhere to the US Constitution; and Khzir Khan has written that “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shariah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”
Read the Breitbart News article which tells at length how Khzir Khan praises “the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.” (click here)
The Constitution was only the tip of the iceberg. Robert Spencer in Jihad Watch also reported that Mr. Khan’s website “shows that as a lawyer he engages in procurement of EB5 immigration visas and other ‘Related Immigration Services.’” In other words, he financially benefits from Muslims buying their way into American citizenship and onto American soil. Purchase American citizenships for the whole family at the incredibly low rate of only $500,000—it’s a steal! (As they steal into our country almost unnoticed.) This EB5 program is full of corruption and who knows how many terrorists may have or still yet come into this country with this lawyer’s aid. To read Robert Spencer’s full article click here. Pamela Geller also reported on this topic hereand here.
It’s no wonder that this lawyer was raging against Trump’s sensible immigration policies; it affects his bread and butter. But what we should wonder is, why did Mr. Khan’s law firm website, which specialized in Muslim immigration, get deleted from the internet after this political fiasco?
We can only scratch the surface here on any of these issues; but, perhaps the most disturbing of these issues—and the deepest—is best described by Matthew Boyle’s article published by Breitbart News. If you think the title is a mouthful – “Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together”- wait until you read the whole article; click here.
The article starts off with, “Khizr Khan, the Muslim Gold Star father that the mainstream media and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been using to criticize Donald J. Trump, has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia—and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. In addition to those ties to the wealthy Islamist nation, Khan also has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States—and has deep ties to the ‘Clinton Cash’ narrative through the Clinton Foundation.”
When thinking of the war we are supposed to be fighting with terrorism, think about the fact that the government of Saudi Arabia has donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation: “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million.” (Schoffstall)
The rest of this article is a wealth of information and provides leads and links to follow. Inform yourself of who Khan is and of the depths of corruption found in the Democratic Presidential nominee, Hillary Clinton. See how death follows her and is manipulated by her. Get familiar with the “Clinton Cash” narrative by watching this YouTube video found here.
If these little GOP “yippers” had taken some time to get informed, before “answering the matter,” they might have spoken to the truth of the matter instead of being swallowed up in the emotional trappings meant to deceive. Instead of yipping at the “Big dog,” they might have pointed out how similar Mr. Khan and Hillary are. Let’s look at a few things we learned from this Constitution touting Muslim and the DNC nomination:
· They both infer a respect for the Constitution while actually promoting Shariah law with their actions
· Mr. Khan deleted his website while Hillary deleted emails, both, presumably, to hide their own interests
· They both have a desire to see Muslims come to this country in droves
· Mr. Khan spoke truth with his statement, “We will keep getting stronger when Hillary Clinton becomes our president.” That is, it’s truth as he spoke to other Muslims and jihadists throughout the country and around the world.
· Both Hillary and Khan scoff at the individualism that Western society has been built on and which the Constitution protects: Khan has stated, “Individual has to be sacrificed, collectivity has a special sanctity attached to it in Islam.” Hillary has stated, “We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what’s best for society.”
In response to that last point, let’s hear from author Ayn Rand: “The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.” And yet, that’s exactly what the Democratic Party claims to do.
If Chris Christie, Paul Ryan, and these other GOP “yippers” would have stood firm on principle against a speech which called their party’s nominee a “Divider” and named their opponent’s nominee a “Healer,” they wouldn’t look so bad today. While it’s true that the media is complicit in how the masses are fooled, Republican leaders don’t need to give them ammunition or help them out.
Perhaps these little “yippers” still couldn’t find it in them to say, “Nope.” The least they could have done was look into the matter and speak to the truth. The least they could have done is give a response similar to the founder of “US Defense Watch,” Ray Starmann. We close with his open letter to Mr. Khan, which conveys the patriotic respect demanded for a son’s sacrifice, yet speaks the truth clearly and bluntly.
Please click on this ending link; research these things and initiate or take part in the conversations around you, shedding truth, salt, and light to the uninformed and misinformed so prevalently found in society today.
Click here.
To support our efforts please click here or mail your gift to American Decency Association (ADA), PO Box 202, Fremont, MI 49412.
American Decency Association is a member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability.
To Unsubscribe send an email to: info@americandecency.org and include word “unsubscribe” in subject line.
Call us:
231-924-4050Email us:
info@americandecency.orgWrite us:
American Decency AssociationCopyright 2024 American Decency
