What is the point of a federal government that chooses to fight for the wrong side?

By: American Decency Staff

America has enjoyed incredible freedoms and security unlike any other nation of the world.  It hasn’t been happenstance.  It has been due to its Founding Fathers, its Constitution, its citizenry, its military, and mostly God’s amazing grace and mercy.

America.  America.  God shed His grace on Thee.  And crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea. 

We are in war of monumental proportions and we are losing!

As hard as it is to believe, there are those serving in high places that detest this song because they detest this country, its history and its Constitution.  If you don’t understand this reality, you are naïve.    Please realize, friend,  there are those working day and night to evolve America into something vastly different than what our fathers fought for on foreign shores in years gone by. 

It is a horrible thing when you see your government turn against a Constitution that has been the envy of the world for hundreds of years – a Constitution that has led to one nation under God with liberty and justice for all – violated by increasing numbers who deceitfully take an oath to defend it with no intention of doing so.

Our country is currently under an administration which is opposed to the U.S. Constitution and is strategically undermining it.

We are on a path of destruction:   

Connect the dots. 

Consider the following:

During World War II, we wouldn’t have nominated Nazi sympathizers and actual Nazis to occupy high administrative positions.  Yet that’s what we are doing with known terrorists – affiliates with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Steve Emerson:  An Egytian newspaper gave a listing of Muslim Brotherhood members in the White House.  There were others pointed to in the State Department, Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice who are definitely Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers or actually members of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Steve Emerson, is an American author and journalist, Executive Director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism.

Frank Gaffney  specifically documents this trend of Muslim Brotherhood in the George W. Bush and the Obama administrations at


Also see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_3nRIDQcbnk

To keep Americans – particularly researchers, conservative journalists, authors, and specialists in the field from warning others, there is a clear cut attack upon the Freedom of Speech by this administration.   They are bent upon shoving their plan down our throats.  Is Shariah, as opposed to the Constitution, on the horizon?  How could it not be when you connect the dots.

Curtailing freedom of Speech.

Steve Emerson:  Attorney General Eric Holder has quashed indictments of terrorists, financiers because he doesn’t want to alienate the Muslim community.

You can’t talk about radical Islam or you’re accused of being Islamophobic.  The ramnifications are not just minimal.  It happens to have real live consequences when

Major Nidal Hassan kills 13 people and the reason he got away with it was because his

supervisors refused to report him because they were afraid of being called racist.

Steve Emerson in a radio interview on Bill Bennett’s Morning in America, January 8, 2013

Even our military trainers cannot use words like “Islamist” to warn and to identify characteristics of a terrorist. 

One News Now:  The Thomas More Law Center says it has obtained more evidence to prove its contention that the Pentagon is taking its marching orders from Islamic groups in taking extreme disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley, a 1994 graduate of the United States Military academy.

The highly decorated armor officer was excoriated and relieved of a teaching assignment because he discussed negative aspects of Islam in an elective course entitled “Perspectives on Islam and Islamic Radicalism” at the Joint Services Staff College.

"The Pentagon is now doing his bidding," he points out. "And his bidding is there is to be no negative aspect of the religion of Islam or the political ideology of Islam that he is not ready to embrace or which is a concern of national security."

Thompson says the TMLC is considering a federal lawsuit if the case is not resolved by administrative remedy.

There was a day when we could count upon the elite media to report news at least somewhat objectively.  However,  we’ve seen immense erosion on this front for many years.  

Now our elite media is ideologically in bed with them [the jihadists and the radical left]– an alliance between the left and the Jihadist in academic circles. 

Steve Emerson:  In Hollywood, 80% of all Hollywood studios today submit their scripts to radical Islamic groups for their approval. These are Muslim Brotherhood groups that say in their own bylaws that any citation of a radical Islamic protagonist or mention of the word radical Islam is racist.  In fact, that’s the policy of this administration.  You cannot use the words “Radical Islam”. You can only use the words” violent extremism”.

Individuals like Steve Emerson, Daniel Pipes or Robert Spencer or other experts or investigators of radical Islam have been blacklisted in terms of speaking before the FBI, The Department of Justice , Department of Homeland Security. 

Steve Emerson in a radio interview on Bill Bennett’s Morning in America, January 8, 2013

Individuals like those named above are merely trying to do what good citizens have done down through the ages when necessary – caringly warn their fellow citizens, neighbors and friends when an enemy is lurking at their door. 

At a time when the Muslim Brotherhood are spreading, and expanding influence and power throughout the Mideast, Europe, and North America, the Obama Administration has already made drastic cuts to the military with more massive cuts to be made. 

Sequestration– the Obama administration has already cut $487 billion from the Defense spending and more has been projected.  It is anticipated that upwards of 800,000 persons will lose their jobs.

Andrew C. McCarthy: In addition, Well . . . the president has announced that not only will he continue funding Egypt’s Islamist government, but he intends to include in that U.S. aid the provision of 20 F-16 fighter jets.  Moreover, Obama is continuing his administration’s collaboration with the 57-government Organization of Islamic Cooperation on the “Istanbul Process.”

What is the Istanbul Process?   The Istanbul Process is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s major transnational law initiative, undertaken in partnership with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). It was established last year to “implement” measures against speech and expression that negatively “stereotype[s]” Islam and Muslims, with a particular emphasis on enacting them in the West. 


Andrew C. McCarthy III is a former Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York.  A Republican, he is most notable for leading the 1995 terrorism prosecution against Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman and eleven others. 

Andrew C. McCarthy, former Federal Prosecutor and prosecutor of the Blind Sheik who was convicted of trying to take down the World Trade Center in 1993, comments on the Istanbul Process.  The product that has emerged out of that process is a resolution called Resolution 1618 which is blatantly unconstitutional but would in fact if enforced in the United States substantially curb American Free Speech Rights.

It’s clear why the Islamists want to impose Shariah/blasphemy standards which would require an actual repeal of the First Amendment.  They want to impose the Shariah stricture that basically says that any criticism of Islam is prohibited and in Islamic societies is brutally punished.

From the left standpoint they are both sympathetic to the Islamist narrative about the United States but more importantly from their perspective they like to see any situation in which the rights that are laid out and the limitations which are laid out in the Constitution are undone because that lends a real force to their view of the Constitution as an organic document that they can shape and evolve and with it evolve the society into something that is more conducive to their vision of what the good society is.  So they have a variety of motivations for being supportive of this Islamist agenda as well.  

I think any place you look whether it’s First Amendment rights, Second Amendments rights which are now under real assault.  Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights – almost everywhere you look – the left is aligning with organizations that want to see an evolution in what the previous originalists understanding of what those rights was.

Andrew C. McCarthy interviewed by Frank Gaffney at Secure Freedom Radio, December 18, 2012

What is the point of a federal government that chooses to fight for the wrong side?

What is of great moment is that the president has joined the hostile forces against us, against Americans whose protection is the sole reason for the federal government’s existence. If that is to be Washington’s posture, what do we need it for? It is bad enough when Leviathan cannot tell America’s friends from America’s enemies. But what is the point of a federal government that cannot tell America’s enemies from America? Or that can tell perfectly well, but chooses to fight for the wrong side?


Another case in point:  Why would the Pentagon allow this kind of stuff to happen?

It’s an outrage.

Al-Awlaki bought  air tickets  for 9/11 Muslim terrorists, FBI knew but he was  invited to the Pentagon anyway to dine and preach.


What about the most recent Obama nominees?

Secretary of State:  John Kerry

Secretary of Defense:  Chuck Hagel

Director of the CIA:  John Brennan

This is the team that is meant to manage the decline of the United States, the retreat of America from the world. It’s not a pivot.  …   It’s about turning inward. 

Danielle Pletka, the Vice President in charge of Foreign and Defense Studies at the American Enterprise Institute,  in an interview with Frank Gaffney on his daily radio broadcast, Secure Freedom Radio, January 9, 2013

What about ICNA and their $25,000,000 campaign to promote Shariah inside the United States? 

[Taken from radio interview between Frank Gaffney and Andrew C. McCarthy:]

GAFFNEY:  ICNA (The Islamic Circle of North America has announced that it has a 25 million dollar campaign to promote Shariah inside the United States.  Is there any question in your mind that the alignment is being perpetrated here that the Constitution of the United States and Shariah are compatible is a fraud?

MCCARTHY:  It’s a total fraud.  I think the silver lining of these campaigns is that they are provoking blowback campaigns on the grassroots level by Americans.  Really that’s the only way we’re going to get good change.  We’re not going to get it from Washington.  It’s going to come from the grassroots that don’t want Shariah.

GAFFNEY:  … if we fail to provide the change we will be sacrificing everything we care about – our Constitutional freedoms, our form of government, indeed our country itself I fear.    

Andrew C. McCarthy interviewed by Frank Gaffney at Secure Freedom Radio, December 18, 2012


To support our efforts please click here or mail your gift to American Decency Association (ADA), PO Box 202, Fremont, MI 49412.  

American Decency Association is a member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability.

Contact us:

Call us:


Email us:


Write us:

American Decency Association
P.O.Box 202
Fremont, MI 49412
Newsletter Signup

Copyright 2024 American Decency