"President Obama has nominated
David Ogden to a high-level position in his sub-cabinet -- not a position in
agriculture or defense but the number two position at the Department of Justice,
the Department charged with prosecuting adult and child pornography violations.
The porn industry is so excited by the prospect of having one of their allies
in this key position that they have not been able to contain themselves. XBiz,
a leading 'adult' newswire, called Ogden a 'strong pick,' and porn attorney
Colin Hardacre of Los Angeles said Ogden’s nomination is 'a good sign
for the adult industry.' ..."
[Taken from an article by Cathy Ruse Senior Fellow for Legal Studies at the
Family Research Council
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30794
February 23, 2009
Personal note:
Read this carefully and join with me in calling your U.S. Senator. We must
do our best to stop this nomination now. If we do nothing, we will have no
one else to blame other than ourselves for not doing our part when we could
have.
The implications of this pornography attorney being placed as the second in
command at the U.S. Justice Department are more than I can possibly imagine,
but what I can imagine is enough to make me fear for children and their innocence
and for their protection and the further "pornification of America"!
Remember, the vote on David Ogden is this Thursday in the Judiciary Committee.
Call your U.S. Senator, 202-224-3121.
Bill Johnson
================================
President Barack Obama has nominated David Ogden for Deputy Attorney General.
It is another bad nomination that should not be confirmed. Ogden is a hero
to the porn industry for good reason.
His clients include a long line of porn companies such as Playboy, Penthouse
and Adam & Eve. But in his long career defending the interests of pornographers,
no case is more shocking or repugnant than a case in which David Ogden fought
for the rights of a pedophile to receive a certain genre of child pornography.
Here are the facts.
In 1991, customs officials intercepted a mailing requesting two videotapes
with the titles “Little Girl Bottums (Underside)” and “Little
Blonds” distributed by the Nather Company in Las Vegas, Nevada. The
purchaser was a Pennsylvania man named Stephen Knox, and a search of his apartment
revealed other videotapes distributed by the Nather Company containing numerous
vignettes of teenage and preteen females, between the ages of ten and seventeen,
striking provocative poses for the camera. The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
described the tapes as follows:
The children were obviously being directed by someone off-camera. All of
the children wore bikini bathing suits, leotards, underwear, or other abbreviated
attire while they were being filmed….The photographer would zoom in
on the children’s pubic and genital area and display a close-up view
for an extended period of time. Most of the videotapes were set to music.
In some sequences, the child subjects were dancing or gyrating in a fashion
not natural for their age.
The Nather catalogues found in Knox’s apartment -- in which Knox had
checked off his favorites -- showed the videos were obviously created for
and pandered to pedophiles. One ad read: “'Sassy Sylphs’ will
blow your mind so completely you’ll be begging for mercy.” Another
read:
Just look at what we have in this incredible tape: about 14 girls between
the ages of 11 and 17 showing so much panty and a-- you’ll get dizzy.
There are panties showing under shorts and under dresses and skirts; there
are b--bs galore and T-back (thong) bathing suits on girls as young as 15
that are so revealing it’s almost like seeing them naked (some say even
better).
Federal child pornography law prohibits the depiction of “sexually
explicit conduct” involving children, including videos focusing on the
“lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area.” The 3rd
Circuit Court of Appeals had no trouble concluding that Stephen Knox was guilty
of violating child pornography law.
David Ogden claimed Knox was innocent.
In the brief he filed for the ACLU, Ogden said the videos were not child
pornography at all. He argued that the children’s genitals were not
clearly visible and that the videos should therefore be treated as just another
art form with full protection by the First Amendment. Even more outrageous
was Ogden’s claim that if the Nather tapes were child porn, then librarians
everywhere would fear prosecution! Libraries had images of clothed minors,
he argued, any of which could be subject to prosecution limited only by a
subjective test of lasciviousness.
This argument was clearly absurd, and thankfully the court concluded it was
also legally wrong. On June 9, 1994, the Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment
against Stephen Knox for violation of federal child pornography law.
President Obama has nominated David Ogden to a high-level position in his
sub-cabinet -- not a position in agriculture or defense but the number two
position at the Department of Justice, the Department charged with prosecuting
adult and child pornography violations. The porn industry is so excited by
the prospect of having one of their allies in this key position that they
have not been able to contain themselves. XBiz, a leading “adult”
newswire, called Ogden a “strong pick,” and porn attorney Colin
Hardacre of Los Angeles said Ogden’s nomination is “a good sign
for the adult industry.”
Can Americans trust Ogden to administer justice and vigorously prosecute those
who violate our pornography laws? Based on his record, the answer is clearly
no. There should be no room at the Department of Justice for a man like David
Ogden.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=30794
Cathy Ruse is Senior Fellow for Legal Studies at the Family Research Council
=================
To donate online:
http://americandecency.org/folder.php?f=donate
American Decency Association
Bill Johnson, President
P.O. Box 202
Fremont, MI 49412
ph: 231-924-4050
http://www.americandecency.org
