As I write this, the future of our religious freedom is being discussed in a marble building hundreds of miles away. How fitting that the halls where the future will be decided is modeled after Greek temples to false gods.
Today, the case of Jack Phillips is being argued before the Supreme Court. As we’ve written about before, Phillips, the proprietor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, is fighting for his right to refuse to create a message through his own artwork which does not line up with his religious beliefs. He is fighting for religious liberty at a fundamental level.
In this case, of course, he has refused to bake a cake for a homosexual wedding. As we’ve noted before, Jack Phillips did not refuse service to homosexuals. In fact he was willing to sell them any cake they’d like. However, he would not allow his artwork to be a centerpiece to a wedding he deemed immoral.
That ought to be a decision left up to any artist.
In fact, on the other side of the ideological divide, myriads of fashion designers have refused to allow their designs to be featured on Melania Trump. In a similar example, when Ivanka Trump shared a picture from her home on social media in which a liberal artist’s work appeared on the wall behind her, the artist demanded she remove it from her home!
Clearly, liberals are quite defensive of their own freedom of expression.
And other artists recognize the threat this case poses to their freedoms as well; hundreds of them signed on to an amicus brief in support of Phillips. As the Daily Signal reports, “479 creative professionals from all 50 states, D.C., and Puerto Rico highlight their concern that a ruling against Phillips will threaten their expressive freedom in the workplace.
These cake designers, musicians, florists, photographers, journalists, videographers, poets, songwriters, calligraphers, graphic designers, cartoonists, bloggers, website designers, authors, actors, writers, sculptors, and painters have differing views on gay marriage. But they come together here for one purpose: ’They do not want the state forcing them to convey objectionable messages through their art.’”
The implications of this case, however, are much more widespread than for just the artistic professions. If the courts decide that the right of Jack Phillips to choose which ideas his art will express is less important than the feelings of his potential clients, that will paint a clear picture of how the government will recognize all of our rights to express our beliefs and live by them.
Tony Perkins expressed it succinctly this morning, on the steps of the Supreme Court building, ”We simply want the freedom that our constitution guarantees us: the freedom to believe and to live according to those beliefs.”
One more point worth noting is that while the U.S. Constitution “guarantees” us those rights, as Perkins mentions, it does not grant those rights. They are “endowed by our Creator!”
It is our freedom as human beings, and our duty as Christians to proclaim the truth of God’s word, whether the government protects that speech or not.
Join me in praying for wisdom for the Justices as they hear arguments today.
As always, God is in control, working through all things for His glory and our good.
As we come to the end of 2017, we look back at all of the chaos and corruption and craziness that we've seen in our nation and our world. We hope that you would agree that our ministry has shown the light of Truth into all of that darkness. If you've appreciated ADA's insights, writings, and events in the previous months, would you consider helping us finish this year out strong with a financial gift? Without the help of supporters like you, American Decency would no longer be able to inform, encourage, and exhort many readers just like you. A gift of any amount would be so appreciated. Thank you and God bless!
To support our efforts please click here or mail your gift to American Decency Association (ADA), PO Box 202, Fremont, MI 49412.
American Decency Association is a member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability.